A Review Of case laws on bail
A Review Of case laws on bail
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights even though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking within the present case. In these kinds of circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is also dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
four. Record shows that the petitioner has become booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Although the petitioner has obtained bail in those cases, it does, prima facie, create that the petitioner is prone to repeating the offence.
Even though there isn't any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds tiny sway. Still, if there is not any precedent during the home state, relevant case legislation from another state could be regarded as by the court.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. If the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days to the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we're guided with the decision of the Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of the grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any opportunity adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted for being crafted.
Any court may perhaps seek to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of this type of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.
Online access for the case management system to the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases may be searched using name or case number.
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and here the petitioners could seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only finished If your employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence plus the petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
PACER allows anybody with an account to search and Identify appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for just a PACER account.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that can be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.
Pakistan’s legal system is not without flaws: overhauling is overdue and also the law regarding murder demands serious reconsideration and clarification. For the time being, the least that can be done is to make sure that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.